Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

E Jourdan, N Boissel, S Chevret… - Blood, The Journal …, 2013 - ashpublications.org
E Jourdan, N Boissel, S Chevret, E Delabesse, A Renneville, P Cornillet, O Blanchet…
Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2013ashpublications.org
Not all patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) display a good
outcome. Modern risk factors include KIT and/or FLT3 gene mutations and minimal residual
disease (MRD) levels, but their respective values have never been prospectively assessed.
A total of 198 CBF-AML patients were randomized between a reinforced and a standard
induction course, followed by 3 high-dose cytarabine consolidation courses. MRD levels
were monitored prospectively. Gene mutations were screened at diagnosis. Despite a more …
Abstract
Not all patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) display a good outcome. Modern risk factors include KIT and/or FLT3 gene mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, but their respective values have never been prospectively assessed. A total of 198 CBF-AML patients were randomized between a reinforced and a standard induction course, followed by 3 high-dose cytarabine consolidation courses. MRD levels were monitored prospectively. Gene mutations were screened at diagnosis. Despite a more rapid MRD decrease after reinforced induction, induction arm did not influence relapse-free survival (RFS) (64% in both arms; P = .91). Higher WBC, KIT, and/or FLT3-ITD/TKD gene mutations, and a less than 3-log MRD reduction after first consolidation, were associated with a higher specific hazard of relapse, but MRD remained the sole prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. At 36 months, cumulative incidence of relapse and RFS were 22% vs 54% (P < .001) and 73% vs 44% (P < .001) in patients who achieved 3-log MRD reduction vs the others. These results suggest that MRD, rather than gene mutations, should be used for future treatment stratifications in CBF-AML patients. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2006-005163-26 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT 00428558.
ashpublications.org